[ad_1]
TO do battle within the boardroom, The Apprentice candidates are normally suited and booted with not a hair misplaced.
However a few of them are much less squeaky clear than they seem. Right here we reveal the contestants who’ve had run-ins with the regulation…
Alexander Britez
11
In February final 12 months it emerged Alexander Britez, who appeared on the BBC present in 2011 and was fired after the second activity, was going through a hefty £200,000 court docket positive.
Hassle flared between Britez and neighbours David and Isabel O’Brien when Mrs O’Brien’s stepdad tumbled right into a “ragged” 3ft trench dug alongside his £1million home in 2018.
The slim gap had been dug within the passageway between the homes earlier than Britez owned it to take care of a humid drawback, and he refused to fill it in, sparking a bitter row.
It went to court docket, operating up huge authorized payments on either side, however property agent Britez misplaced the battle and needed to foot the invoice.
Gary Poulton
11
Gary Poulton – who was on the 2015 sequence of The Apprentice – was arrested that very same 12 months after a “disturbance” on the residence he shared along with his accomplice and daughter.
The TV star was questioned by police in a 4am go to, taken to a police station and arrested, however was later launched with out cost.
A spokesperson for West Midlands Police confirmed on the time: “A 34-year-old man was arrested on suspicion of frequent assault and brought to Chelmsley Wooden station. He was later launched with out cost.”
Gary disputed this, writing on social media: “I used to be not arrested, nor taken into police custody. Whereas the police did go to my dad and mom’ home I cooperated with them totally they usually moved on with out additional motion.”
Syed Ahmed
11
Syed Ahmed was a contestant on the 2006 sequence of The Apprentice – and famously bought along with the eventual winner Michelle Dewberry.
However that 12 months the businessman was arrested a few instances for drink driving and on suspicion of cash laundering.
In July 2006, Syed – who had already been banned from driving – was discovered thrice over the restrict by police, and handed a two-month suspended sentence.
A month later he was arrested on suspicion of being concerned in a cash laundering operation, however launched on a bail.
A spokesman later issued a press release for Syed, studying: “After discovering out {that a} case had been delivered to Chingford Police Station involving Mr Syed Ahmed’s then enterprise accomplice, he determined to go to the police station and current the details.
“He was questioned and the Metropolitan Police took no additional motion. Mr Syed Ahmed was not concerned in any incorrect doing.”
Sharon McAllister
11
When she appeared on The Apprentice in 2006, Sharon McAllister boasted to Lord Sugar she might “ship the undeliverable”.
However 9 years later she was jailed for contempt of court docket, after repeatedly failing to observe a court docket order, as a part of a authorized battle together with her former accomplice.
She strongly denied the allegations towards her, however spent three months in jail.
In 2017 she was cleared on enchantment, and advised the Herald: “Folks like me get caught up in a system that is damaged. “Everybody wished to make an instance of me as a result of I would been on tv and the system is in items.
“It is so arduous to get your life again. Nobody stopped to assume that this wasn’t proper.”
Christopher Farrell
11
Simply days earlier than the primary episode of the 2010 sequence aired, it was revealed one of many contestants, Christopher Farrell, was on bail for fraud – and had a earlier weapons conviction.
The star had made three mortgage functions and one re-mortgage utility totalling £750,000 on behalf of shoppers with out informing any of them.
He initially tried to go the blame to work colleagues earlier than finally admitting his guilt – and was handed a 9 month jail sentence, suspended for 2 years.
In 2015, he was ordered to pay a £400 positive plus £150 compensation and an extra court docket price of £125 when he was discovered responsible of punching a taxi driver within the mouth.
Joanna Riley
11
Christopher wasn’t the one one with a prison previous in his sequence, because it got here out that Joanna Riley had beforehand been convicted for racially abusing three cab drivers after a boozy evening out.
Joanna kicked and brought about £1,000 harm to the taxi drivers’ automobiles and launched a foul-mouthed tirade after considered one of them made a sexually express remark to her.
She pleaded responsible to “inflicting racially aggravated concern or provocation of violence” and was given a two-year conditional discharge.
Joanna’s conviction by no means confirmed up when BBC producers did a background examine on her, because it had been cleared.
Thomas Skinner
11
He’s well-known for his “BOSH!” catchphrase within the 2019 sequence of The Apprentice – however Thomas Skinner was beforehand in bother with the regulation over dealing with stolen items.
In 2011 he was sentenced in court docket after being charged with dishonestly dealing with 4,992 tubes of Physique Store cleaning gels price practically £40,000 and having 2,000 diazepam tablets.
In the identical trial a mate of his from the identical space was accused of getting practically 10,000 cleaning gels price £76,000.
When contacted, the BBC mentioned it was conscious of Thomas’s previous errors as a part of its intensive background checks, and that the conviction had been spent.
Michaela Wain
11
Earlier than she appeared on the 2017 sequence of The Apprentice, Michaela Wain had a prison conviction for obstructing a police officer in Bolton, the place she’s from.
The businesswoman was arrested and fined £1,000 following the incident in 2014 – and was more and more fearful about it coming to mild when she was introduced for the BBC present.
A supply advised The Solar, on the time: “Michaela is extremely embarrassed about what occurred.
“Ever since she gained her place on The Apprentice she’s been fearful about individuals discovering out.”
James Hill
11
One other Apprentice candidate who had a conviction earlier than The Apprentice was 2014’s James Hill.
James was convicted of assault again in 2009, after getting concerned in two brawls.
One sufferer advised The Solar James assaulted him after he spoke to his girlfriend, after which 4 months later he bit one other man’s ear on Christmas Eve.
James admitted finishing up the 2 assaults and acquired a six-month jail sentence suspended for 18 months. He was additionally ordered to pay a complete of £500 compensation to his victims and £755 in prices.
BBC producers mentioned on the time: “It’s a spent conviction beneath the provisions of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 and due to this fact James was eligible to use for the programme.”
A spokesperson added: “James will not be pleased with what occurred, he was younger and irresponsible and really a lot regrets and has discovered from his actions.”
Natalie Hughes
11
In 2017, a 12 months after she took half in The Apprentice, Natalie Hughes’ husband Kristopher O’Malley was jailed for being a part of a £700,000 heroin ring.
After being snared by a large-scale cop probe, O’Malley acquired six and a half years in jail.
When contacted by The Solar on the time, she mentioned: “I’m only a hard-working lassie attempting to higher myself. The court docket case has nothing to do with me.
“I wasn’t even on the court docket case. I’ve nothing to say about it.”
It got here simply 4 years after O’Malley had been beforehand locked up for drug-dealing — following a trial that started with Natalie sharing the dock with him.
Natalie was cleared of being concerned within the provide of heroin and cocaine earlier than she appeared on The Apprentice.
Tre Azam
11
Tre Azam completed third on the 2007 sequence of The Apprentice and went on to seem on The Weakest Hyperlink and breakfast information exhibits.
However a 12 months later in November 2008 he was convicted of creating false statements on housing and council tax advantages price £8,686.
It emerged his dad had paid payments for him whereas he was on advantages, and he had an undeclared again account the place he deposited cash.
Azam misplaced his enchantment, and later admitted: “I am simply very upset. We had been simply saying they manipulated the method. It was on technical grounds that I used to be prosecuted. We gave it a shot and I assume it did not repay.
“On the finish of the day, if I would been extra cautious and made positive every little thing was proper I might have mounted this mess.”
He’s now CEO of Myndplay, a tech firm which specialises in brainwave sensors.
[ad_2]
Supply hyperlink
