Invoice McKibben Lists 5 Motive New LNG Terminals Received’t Be Permitted. We Add One Extra

[ad_1]

Join each day information updates from CleanTechnica on e-mail. Or observe us on Google Information!


When Russia invaded Ukraine, Europe’s provide of low cost methane fuel from Russia was abruptly reduce off. For a few years, Europe trusted that offer of fuel to energy its industries, generate its electrical energy, and warmth lots of its houses. Instantly, fossil gas pursuits in the US noticed an enormous new enterprise alternative. Take methane fuel from fracked wells in America, compress it into liquid pure fuel (LNG) and float it over to Europe aboard specifically designed LNG tankers.

Building quickly started on main new LNG terminals in Europe to obtain the fuel from America, most of which is shipped from ports alongside the coast of Texas and Louisiana. However lots of these ports usually are not deep sufficient to accommodate the LNG tankers and so a plan was developed to construct offshore terminals within the Gulf of Mexico that may pipe the fuel from shore to the ready ships. These plans are awaiting approval from the Biden administration as we communicate.

Invoice McKibben has been waging a fierce marketing campaign to thwart these new LNG terminals. This week in his newest Substack post, he lists 5 the reason why he believes the administration won’t ship the approvals to make these terminals a actuality.

First, he cites the convergence of many vital voices who’ve expressed opposition to the deliberate LNG terminals. This week, 170 scientists wrote to the president to induce the plans be rejected. In response to Meals and Water Watch, the letter cited the big influence the proposal would have on world local weather air pollution — about 20 occasions that of the recently-approved Willow oil drilling challenge in Alaska. Authentic signers of the letter embrace famous local weather and environmental scientists Rose Abramoff, Robert Howarth, Mark Jacobson, Peter Kalmus, Michael Mann, Sandra Steingraber, Farhana Sultana and Aradhna Tripati. The letter mentioned partly:

“Taken collectively, if all U.S. tasks within the allowing pipeline are accepted, they might result in 3.9 billion tons of greenhouse fuel emissions yearly, which is bigger than the complete annual emissions of the European Union… We implore you to show again from this course, reject CP2 and different fossil gas export tasks, and put us on a speedy and simply trajectory off fossil fuels.“

McKibben writes,” Folks dwelling close by these monumental services have at all times identified they have been monumental, however in latest months the remainder of us have gotten a significantly better concept of the size. A lot fracked fuel is now pouring out by way of the Gulf that it wipes out the positive factors beneath the president’s IRA clear power plans; certainly, it wipes out all of the emission reductions made because the flip of the century (emhasis added).

LNG Emissions From Tankers

His second level is that in October, professor Robert Howarth of Cornell College printed a examine which claims the leakage of methane fuel from these tankers as they cross the Atlantic Ocean is so excessive that the web result’s the fuel finally ends up having 24% extra emissions than burning an equal quantity of coal. Within the conclusion of his examine, Howarth writes:

“[We] want to maneuver away from any use of LNG as a gas as rapidly as doable, and to right away cease building of any new LNG infrastructure. These proponents of exporting LNG from the US are unsuitable after they assert a local weather profit for using LNG over coal. In truth, the LNG greenhouse fuel footprint is bigger than that of coal and brief time period power wants resembling these attributable to the Russian invasion of Ukraine are higher met by reopening closed coal services, on a brief foundation, than by increasing LNG infrastructure.

“Any new LNG infrastructure will turn out to be a stranded asset as society strikes away from all fossil fuels. In recent times, many have acknowledged that we have to transfer away from pure fuel, in addition to coal, to deal with the local weather emergency. With a fair better greenhouse fuel footprint than pure fuel, ending using LNG should be a world precedence.”

Extra From Invoice McKibben

LNG in Gulf of MexicoThird, McKibben says new information demonstrates these exports increase the worth of pure fuel for these Individuals who nonetheless depend upon it for cooking and heating — which in all probability additionally explains the outstanding polling information displaying simply how opposed Individuals are to fracking the nation after which sending the ensuing fuel off to  different counties, particularly these in Asia. There’s a high quality irony in the truth that world heating has now induced such drought in Central America that these monster LNG tankers can now not use the Panama canal to get to their meant locations.

Fourth, extra new information has demonstrated that we’re already supplying greater than sufficient LNG to make Europe entire in opposition to the cutoff of Russian provides within the wake of the Ukraine invasion. That market information makes it abundantly clear that Europe is coping fairly nicely with the absence of low cost Russian methane fuel because the Continent makes a pivot of heroic proportions to renewables, conservation methods, and warmth pumps.

The firth motive Invoice McKibben offers for why he thinks these new deep water LNG terminals received’t be accepted by the Biden administration is as a result of 200 different nations joined with America in Dubai on the shut of the COP 28 convention in a promise to “transition away from fossil fuels.” That was an historic second within the trajectory of COP conferences, which by no means earlier than have discovered the braveness to counsel fossil fuels are why such conferences are wanted within the first place. If the US is critical about that pledge. it can’t in good conscience approve these monster LNG terminals within the Gulf of Mexico.

A Sixth Motive Not To Approve LNG Terminals

We are able to consider another reason why the Biden administration ought to reject the proposed deep water LNG terminals. Simply this week, it promulgated new guidelines for inexperienced hydrogen manufacturing that rebuffed the fossil gas business, which wished to have the ability to declare monumental federal subsidies to provide not so inexperienced hydrogen. The administration rejected their pleas and prompt guidelines that save the very best subsidies for tasks that don’t depend on electrical energy from typical assets for greater than 1 % of the whole wanted to provide hydrogen.

The inexperienced hydrogen program holds out the promise of billions of {dollars} in federal tax credit and incentives to create a brand new business that makes really inexperienced hydrogen. If the LNG terminals within the Gulf are accepted, their emissions would greater than cancel out the emissions reductions anticipated to consequence from the inexperienced hydrogen program.

Since that may be illogical, we assume the administration will decline to offset the emissions reductions contemplated by its inexperienced hydrogen program by approving an enormous enhance in emissions for the LNG business. Then once more, we’re speaking about politics right here, so something is feasible. However McKibben and others are ramping up the strain on the administration to do the precise factor. We must always know shortly how the Biden administration decides to deal with the LNG query.


Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Wish to promote? Wish to counsel a visitor for our CleanTech Speak podcast? Contact us right here.


Our Newest EVObsession Video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=videoseries


I do not like paywalls. You do not like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Right here at CleanTechnica, we carried out a restricted paywall for some time, but it surely at all times felt unsuitable — and it was at all times powerful to resolve what we must always put behind there. In principle, your most unique and finest content material goes behind a paywall. However then fewer folks learn it!! So, we have determined to fully nix paywalls right here at CleanTechnica. However…

 

Like different media firms, we’d like reader help! In case you help us, please chip in a bit month-to-month to assist our group write, edit, and publish 15 cleantech tales a day!

 

Thanks!


Commercial



 


CleanTechnica makes use of affiliate hyperlinks. See our coverage right here.




[ad_2]

Supply hyperlink